<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Public-Policy on The Solutions Are Known</title><link>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/categories/public-policy/</link><description>Recent content in Public-Policy on The Solutions Are Known</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Howard Holm</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 02:41:29 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://holmgrown.com/tsak/categories/public-policy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Economic Policy</title><link>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/economic-policy/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:59:14 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/economic-policy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Markets do useful things. They let people try ideas, discover demand, build
businesses, and challenge the established way of doing something.
Competition can reward better products and make failure less permanent.
None of that requires believing that whatever makes the most money must be
good for society.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;ldquo;greed is good&amp;rdquo; version of capitalism turns morality on its head.
It says extracting more value for an owner is sufficient justification
for a business decision, even when the costs land on workers,
customers, communities, or the environment. Greed is instead a deadly
sin, but you needn&amp;rsquo;t delve into Judeo-Christian ethics to discover
how harmful it is. Competition drives people to do better for
themselves and for society, but unregulated capitalism actually
distorts competition and rewards
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking"&gt;rent-seeking&lt;/a&gt; behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Healthcare</title><link>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/healthcare/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:59:14 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/healthcare/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A healthcare system should help people stay well, catch problems early, and
manage illness before it becomes a crisis. When serious illness does come, it
should provide excellent treatment without making the illness a financial
catastrophe. That seems like a modest expectation for a wealthy country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet Americans regularly face a different set of questions. Is the doctor in
the network? Will the insurer authorize the treatment? How much of the
deductible is left? Can the appointment wait until the next paycheck? Is
there still a hospital close enough in an emergency?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Money in Politics</title><link>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/money-in-politics/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:59:14 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/money-in-politics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every citizen has one vote. We do not have the same ability to put an
issue on the agenda, fund a campaign, or keep an argument in front of
the public. Some of that is unavoidable. People have different
skills, audiences, and commitments. But persuasion earned through
public support is not the same as influence bought with a fortune, and
a democracy ought to tell the difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need to reverse the constitutional rule from &lt;em&gt;Citizens United&lt;/em&gt;,
along with broader campaign-finance reform. Of course, people must
have the right to criticize government, organize, publish unpopular
arguments, and challenge the people in office. The design problem is
protecting those freedoms without treating unlimited money as an
untouchable part of political liberty.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Supreme Court</title><link>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/supreme-court/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:59:14 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/supreme-court/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court needs independence. A justice has to be able to tell a
president, Congress, or an angry majority that the law doesn&amp;rsquo;t allow what
they want to do. It also needs legitimacy. People should be able to believe
that cases are decided on legal judgment, not private favors, undisclosed
relationships, or one party&amp;rsquo;s success at manipulating the appointment
calendar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have too often treated those goals as opposites. Accountability gets
described as an attack on independence, and lifetime tenure gets treated as
proof of it. Neither of those is true.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Representation</title><link>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/representation/</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 08:15:55 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/representation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The United States political system gives the people already in office
considerable control over who can replace them. They write the
election rules, and in most cases the party in power draws the
electoral districts. Money is needed to run political campaigns
(see &lt;a href="../money-in-politics/"&gt;money in politics&lt;/a&gt;), most prominently to market
the candidate and his or her positions. For many reasons, the incumbent has advantages in raising
money and generating free publicity. We then act surprised when the
resulting legislature is difficult to dislodge. Senator Chuck Grassley
(R-IA) has been in office since 1981. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
has been in office since 1985. Representatives Hal Rogers (R-KY) and
Chris Smith (R-NJ) have been in office since 1981. While the oldest,
these are &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest-serving_members_of_the_United_States_Congress"&gt;not
outliers&lt;/a&gt;. A
&lt;a href="https://holmgrown.com/tsak/articles/congress-analysis/"&gt;quick analysis&lt;/a&gt; of 2014 to 2024 found
members were about twice as likely to leave on their own terms or die as to
be voted out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>